by lea.haas -

#08 About Oscar And The Globes

On Tuesday, the Oscar nominations for the 96th Academy Awards were announced. The box office hit „Barbie“ received eight nominations, including two for the songs „What Was I Made For?“ by Billie Eilish and „I’m Just Ken,“ performed by actor Ryan Gosling. The film also secured a nomination in the „Best Picture“ category. However, Gerwig did not receive a nomination in the „Best Director“ category, and Robbie, who portrays the plastic doll Barbie in the movie, is not among the nominees for „Best Actress.“

„Barbie“ actor Ryan Gosling criticizes that director Greta Gerwig and co-star Margot Robbie were not nominated for an Oscar. The 43-year-old was quoted by the portals „Variety“ and „People“ saying, „There is no Ken without Barbie, and there is no Barbie movie without Greta Gerwig and Margot Robbie. To say that I am disappointed they are not nominated in their respective categories would be an understatement.“

The fact that „Oppenheimer“ has surpassed „Barbie“ in the nominations seems to exacerbate the situation. Christopher Nolan’s film premiered simultaneously with „Barbie“ in July, leading to a quick rivalry between the two films on the internet, despite their vastly different themes. The contrasting narratives of the two movies sparked numerous memes and discussions under the title „Barbenheimer.“ „Oppenheimer“ is a gray historical film about the „Father of the Atomic Bomb“ Robert Oppenheimer, criticized as „patriarchal“ and „full of toxic masculinity“ by the „Team Barbie“ supporters. On the other hand, „Barbie“ depicts a colorful Barbie matriarchy where Barbie finally gets a voice, highlighting the completely opposite storytelling approaches of the two films.

The Golden Globes and all the jokes

It seems like Jo Koy’s jokes about „Barbie“ not only fell flat but were also deemed sexist. In the opening monologue, the comedian remarked, „Oppenheimer is based on a 721-page Pulitzer Prize-winning book called ‚The Manhattan Project.‘ Barbie is a plastic doll with big breasts.“ The response from director Greta Gerwig spoke volumes. The comparison between the serious subject matter of „Oppenheimer“ and the superficial portrayal of „Barbie“ in Koys’s joke may have been perceived as inappropriate, with Gerwig’s reaction suggesting disapproval or discomfort with the comments. Sexist remarks can often draw criticism for perpetuating stereotypes and diminishing the achievements or significance of certain subjects.

AND ONCE AGAIN:

Jo Koy’s joke about „Barbie“ revolves around a pivotal moment in the film, where the character transitions from perfect beauty to bad breath, cellulite, and flat feet. The comedian adds a humorous touch by stating, „or as casting directors say: character actor.“ The joke seems to have resonated well, landing like a bomb, especially with Selena Gomez and Dame Helen Mirren, who presumably found it amusing. Comedy often relies on exaggeration and unexpected twists, and in this case, Jo Koy used the contrast between the traditional concept of beauty associated with Barbie and the reality of human imperfections for comedic effect.

All the jokes even though one of the significant moments in barbie was this monologue from America Ferrera:

„It is literally impossible to be a woman. You are so beautiful and so smart, and it kills me that you don’t think you’re good enough. Like, we have to always be extraordinary, but somehow we’re always doing it wrong.

You have to be thin, but not too thin. And you can never say you want to be thin. You have to say you want to be healthy, but also you have to be thin.

You have to have money, but you can’t ask for money because that’s crass. You have to be a boss, but you can’t be mean. You have to lead, but you can’t squash other people’s ideas.

You’re supposed to love being a mother, but don’t talk about your kids all the damn time. You have to be a career woman but also always be looking out for other people.

You have to answer for men’s bad behavior, which is insane, but if you point that out, you’re accused of complaining. You’re supposed to stay pretty for men, but not so pretty that you tempt them too much or that you threaten other women because you’re supposed to be a part of the sisterhood.

But always stand out and always be grateful. But never forget that the system is rigged. So find a way to acknowledge that but also always be grateful. You have to never get old, never be rude, never show off, never be selfish, never fall down, never fail, never show fear, never get out of line.

It’s too hard! It’s too contradictory and nobody gives you a medal or says thank you! And it turns out, in fact, that not only are you doing everything wrong, but also everything is your fault.

I’m just so tired of watching myself and every single other woman tie herself into knots so that people will like us. And if all of that is also true for a doll just representing women, then I don’t even know.“

by lea.haas -

#07 How to find your own voice as a director

Greta Gerwig and her story

Greta Gerwig has developed a unique style throughout her career as an actress, screenwriter, and director. How did she develope her distinctive style:

  1. Mumblecore Movement: Gerwig began her career in the Mumblecore movement, a film genre characterized by improvised dialogue, natural acting, and low production budgets. This experience influenced her early style and helped her develop an affinity for authentic, realistic storytelling.
  2. Collaboration with Noah Baumbach: Working with director Noah Baumbach, especially on films like „Frances Ha“ and „Mistress America,“ played a crucial role in shaping Gerwig’s style. Baumbach’s influence, combined with Gerwig’s own experiences and perspectives, helped form a unique narrative tone.
  3. Self-reflection and Experience: Greta Gerwig has evolved as a versatile artist. She started as an actress, later transitioned to writing scripts, and eventually took on directing. This versatility allowed her to gain a deep understanding of all aspects of film production and refine her own approach.
  4. Interest in Human Relationships: Many of her films revolve around complex human relationships and everyday life. Gerwig has a knack for exploring the depth of human emotions and depicting them in an authentic and often humorous manner.
  5. Feminist Perspective: Gerwig has become a prominent voice for women in film. She brings a feminist perspective to her works, often putting strong female characters at the forefront and challenging stereotypical portrayals.
  6. Humor and Lightness: A characteristic feature of Gerwig’s style is her sense of humor and lightness. Even in serious themes, she often incorporates humorous elements that make her works accessible and engaging.
  7. Visual Aesthetics: Gerwig has also developed a distinctive visual aesthetic, characterized by her camera work and direction. The way she composes images and stages scenes contributes to her unique visual style.

It’s important to note that an artist’s style is often the result of continuous development, influenced by personal experiences, collaborations, and a constant pursuit of creative expression. Greta Gerwig’s style is the product of her artistic journey and her ability to tell authentic stories with a unique creative fingerprint.

Finding your own voice as a director is a personal and evolving journey. Remember, finding your own way as a director is a continuous process of exploration and self-discovery. Be patient, stay passionate about your craft, and allow your unique voice to emerge organically 🙂 Here are some tips and approaches how one can find their voice as a director:

  1. Self-Reflection:
    • Consider your personal experiences, beliefs, and interests. What stories resonate with you on a deep level? Your own background and perspectives can be a source of inspiration for your storytelling.
  2. Education and Study:
    • Study the work of various directors and filmmakers across different genres. Analyze films critically, paying attention to their storytelling techniques, visual styles, and thematic elements. Learn from both classic and contemporary cinema.
  3. Experimentation:
    • Take the time to experiment with different filmmaking techniques. This could involve creating short films, working on small projects, or even just practicing specific aspects of filmmaking such as framing, editing, or sound design.
  4. Collaboration:
    • Collaborate with other filmmakers, writers, and artists. Exposure to different perspectives and working styles can help you refine your own approach. Learn from your collaborators and be open to new ideas.
  5. Seek Feedback:
    • Share your work with others and seek constructive feedback. This can come from peers, mentors, or even online communities. Constructive criticism can provide valuable insights and help you see your work from different perspectives.
  6. Identify Themes and Motifs:
    • Notice recurring themes, motifs, or elements in your work. These might be subconscious expressions of your artistic identity. Understanding these patterns can help you shape and refine your unique style.
  7. Develop a Signature:
    • Consider what sets your storytelling apart. It could be a particular visual style, a recurring theme, or a distinctive approach to character development. Developing a signature element can make your work recognizable.
  8. Stay Authentic:
    • While it’s natural to be inspired by others, avoid imitating them outright. Stay true to your own vision and perspective. Authenticity is key to developing a genuine directorial style.
  9. Learn from Mistakes:
    • Embrace failure as part of the learning process. Analyze what works and what doesn’t in your projects. Each mistake is an opportunity to refine your skills and understand your creative instincts better.
  10. Stay Open to Evolution:
    • Your directorial style is likely to evolve over time. Be open to new influences, experiences, and learning opportunities. Embrace growth and adapt your style as you continue to develop as a filmmaker.

by lea.haas -

#06 Poor Things

Like I wrote in my previous blog posts cinema mirrors societal norms and especially the portrayal of women has been a subject of interest. One cinematic piece that bravely delves into the complexities of female emotions, particularly female rage, is „Poor Things“. I went into this film with zero expectations but was left speechless after I saw it. This film not only highlights the raw intensity of women’s emotions but also serves as a canvas for the exploration of the female gaze, providing a refreshing perspective on storytelling.

The Unapologetic Rage of Women

„Poor Things“ invites viewers to witness the unapologetic rage of its female protagonist, mirroring the suppressed emotions that women have carried for centuries. Directed by Yorgos Lanthimos, the film breaks away from conventional narratives and embraces the power of feminine fury, challenging stereotypes and demanding a reevaluation of societal expectations.

The central character embodies the frustration and anger that women often suppress in the face of adversity. Her journey becomes a poignant exploration of the multifaceted nature of female rage, from quiet rebellion to explosive outbursts. The film encourages audiences to empathize with the struggles women face, shedding light on the resilience required to navigate a world that often dismisses or silences their voices.

A Cinematic Ode to the Female Gaze

„Poor Things“ not only addresses female rage but also offers a unique perspective through the lens of the female gaze. Traditionally, cinema has been dominated by the male gaze, shaping narratives from a male perspective. However, this film challenges the status quo, providing a narrative that is not only driven by a female protagonist but is also seen through her eyes.

The female gaze in „Poor Things“ is characterized by a nuanced portrayal of relationships, desires, and societal expectations. It subverts the traditional norms of objectification and instead focuses on the empowerment and agency of the female characters. Through this lens, the film invites viewers to reevaluate their own perspectives and question ingrained biases in the portrayal of women on screen.

Breaking Stereotypes and Redefining Narratives

„Poor Things“ becomes a catalyst for change in the cinematic landscape, contributing to the ongoing conversation about the representation of women in film. By embracing female rage and the female gaze, the film challenges stereotypes and offers a more authentic portrayal of women’s experiences.

As we continue to dissect and discuss the impact of cinema on societal perceptions, „Poor Things“ stands as a testament to the power of storytelling in reshaping narratives. It encourages a more inclusive and diverse representation of women, paving the way for future films to explore the depth and complexity of the female experience.

In conclusion, „Poor Things“ is not just a film; it’s a statement. A bold declaration that demands attention to the unspoken, the overlooked, and the rage that simmers beneath the surface. It’s a call for a cinematic revolution where the female gaze takes center stage, breaking free from the confines of stereotypes and offering a truer reflection of the diverse stories that women have to tell.

by lea.haas -

#05 Villain Arc

The villain arc in film is a compelling narrative journey that explores the development, motivations, and actions of the antagonist within a story. Here’s how it often unfolds:

1. Introduction and Motivation: Villains are introduced with distinct motives or circumstances that lead them down a darker path. These motivations can stem from personal trauma, a desire for power, revenge, ideology, or even a warped sense of justice.

2. Humanization and Complexity: Well-crafted villain arcs often humanize the antagonist, showing their vulnerabilities, struggles, or the events that shaped their perspective. This complexity adds depth and makes them more relatable or understandable to the audience.

3. Conflict and Opposition: Villains become the primary source of conflict, providing opposition to the protagonist’s goals. Their actions create tension, driving the story forward and challenging the hero both physically and emotionally.

4. Evolution and Development: Throughout the narrative, the villain undergoes changes. They may experience internal conflicts, moments of doubt, or realizations about their actions. This evolution can lead to shifts in their motives or ideologies.

5. Climax and Resolution: The villain arc reaches its peak during the climax, where their actions and motivations collide with the hero’s. This often results in a showdown or confrontation that tests both characters. The resolution of the villain arc can vary—ranging from redemption, defeat, or their own undoing due to their flaws or actions.

6. Impact on the Protagonist: The villain arc deeply impacts the protagonist’s journey. The antagonist’s actions force the hero to grow, adapt, or confront their own weaknesses, leading to character development.

A well-crafted villain arc challenges the audience’s perceptions and generates emotional investment. It explores the shades of gray in morality and humanizes characters who are often seen as purely evil. Some films even offer redemption arcs for villains, showcasing their potential for change or growth.

Ultimately, a compelling villain arc enriches the storytelling experience, providing depth, tension, and a dynamic counterbalance to the hero’s journey.

by lea.haas -

#04 Female Rage

The narrative of female rage in film has evolved significantly throughout history, reflecting changing societal attitudes towards gender, power, and expression. In earlier cinematic narratives, female anger was often subdued or expressed through subtleties due to prevailing cultural norms and censorship.

  • Early Cinema (1920s-1950s): Female characters were typically confined to specific roles, and their anger was often portrayed as repressed or channeled into quieter forms of resistance. For instance, characters like Scarlett O’Hara in „Gone with the Wind“ or Joan Crawford’s Mildred Pierce depicted rage simmering beneath the surface due to societal constraints.
  • 1960s-1970s: This era saw some shifts as films like „Bonnie and Clyde“ or „Thelma & Louise“ showcased women pushing back against societal norms and expressing anger more openly. These narratives explored female rage as a response to oppression or injustice.
  • 1980s-1990s: Films like „Fatal Attraction“ and „Basic Instinct“ sometimes depicted female rage through the lens of mental instability or as a dangerous force, often tying anger to a negative portrayal of female characters.
  • Contemporary Cinema: The portrayal of female rage in recent years has become more diverse and nuanced. Films like „Mad Max: Fury Road“ and „The Hunger Games“ franchise present strong female protagonists who express rage as a response to systemic oppression and personal trauma. These narratives delve into complex emotions and showcase women’s resilience and strength.

Throughout these periods, the narrative of female rage in film has shifted from subdued or villainized portrayals to more empowered and multifaceted representations. These narratives often explore the reasons behind the anger, addressing issues such as gender inequality, abuse, or societal expectations, providing a platform for nuanced storytelling and challenging traditional gender roles. The evolution of these narratives reflects a broader cultural shift towards acknowledging and validating women’s experiences, including their anger, as an integral part of their stories.

by lea.haas -

#03 Written by a woman.

CAUTION: It’s crucial to note that these distinctions are broad generalizations, and many writers defy these expectations. Moreover, the most compelling storytelling often comes from authors who can authentically portray diverse perspectives, regardless of gender.

Explanation

Written by a Women: Women authors often bring a unique perspective to their work, emphasizing emotions, relationships, and character development. They may delve into nuanced explorations of female experiences, offering insights into the complexities of identity, societal expectations, and relationships. Female writers might pay special attention to the interior lives of characters, providing a deep emotional resonance to their stories.

For example, a scene written by a woman might intricately explore the emotions and thoughts of a female protagonist as she navigates a challenging situation. The narrative might emphasize the importance of female friendships, shedding light on the character’s inner strength and resilience.

Written by a Man: Male authors may, on the other hand, approach storytelling with different thematic focuses. Their narratives might center on action, external conflicts, or societal structures. Male writers might explore themes related to masculinity, fatherhood, or the dynamics of power and authority. Their writing style might be more direct or action-oriented.

For instance, a scene written by a man might emphasize the external challenges faced by a male protagonist. The narrative might highlight the character’s journey through physical trials, testing his strength and courage. Themes of camaraderie or competition might also play a significant role in the storytelling.

Bibliography
  • https://publicseminar.org/essays/what-does-it-mean-to-be-written-by-a-woman/
  • https://mashable.com/article/written-by-a-woman-men-writing-women-meme
  • https://genius.com/Mae-muller-written-by-a-woman-lyrics
by lea.haas -

#02 Found my topic?

BREAKING THE MALE GAZE?
THE FEMALE GAZE ON THE MALE GAZE.

After receiving feedback and mentoring, I’ve decided to continue working on the topic of the ‚Male Gaze‘ in film. Given that I encounter it daily and desire more female perspectives in the realm of film, I find it a compelling area to explore further. The exploration of the „Male Gaze“ in film from a female perspective can contribute to understanding and potentially changing the representation of women in the medium. It could also help raise awareness of gender inequality in the film industry.

A lot of different aspects

Exploring the „Male Gaze“ in film from a female perspective involves critically examining how women are portrayed on screen and the impact of this representation on the audience. There are a lot of aspects that I could dive further into like:

  • Historical Context: Explore the historical evolution of the „Male Gaze“ in cinema. How has the representation of women changed over time? Are there specific eras or movements that have influenced these portrayals?
  • Impact on Audience Perception: Investigate how the „Male Gaze“ affects the way audiences perceive women. Consider the psychological and sociocultural implications of repeatedly presenting women through a male-oriented lens.
  • Female Filmmakers and Perspectives: Highlight the work of female filmmakers who challenge or subvert traditional gender portrayals in film. Analyze how their perspectives contribute to a more nuanced and diverse representation of women.
  • Intersectionality: Explore how factors like race, ethnicity, sexuality, and age intersect with the „Male Gaze“ and influence the portrayal of women in film. Consider the experiences of women from different backgrounds.
  • Industry Practices: Examine the behind-the-scenes aspects of the film industry. How do casting decisions, writing, directing, and production contribute to the perpetuation or challenging of the „Male Gaze“?
  • Audience Reception: Investigate how audiences, particularly women, respond to and engage with films that either conform to or challenge the „Male Gaze.“ Do certain portrayals empower or reinforce harmful stereotypes?
  • Changing Trends: Explore contemporary films and movements that actively work against the „Male Gaze.“ Identify examples where the narrative empowers female characters and provides a more authentic representation.
  • Influence on Culture: Consider the broader cultural impact of the „Male Gaze“ in film. How does it contribute to societal norms and expectations regarding gender roles and relationships?
Bibliography
by lea.haas -

#01 Finding the right topic

FIRST TOPIC: The „Male Gaze“ in Film

The term „Male Gaze“ was first described in the 1970s by film critic Laura Mulvey. It refers to a representation of women dominated by the male perspective. In this portrayal, women are often depicted as passive figures without significant value or personality, placed alongside an active male protagonist. Visually, the female character is frequently reduced to her appearance.

Male Gaze is not confined to just films and TV shows; it’s also present in video games, advertisements, social media, and television. This phenomenon persists because there are still significantly more men than women in key roles in the film and television industry, allowing this perspective to prevail. The Male Gaze relies on stereotypical portrayals of men and women, offering viewers limited opportunities for identification due to a lack of diversity in character traits.

It’s essential to understand that the act of looking (Gaze) itself is the consumption of products, and 85% of characters in Hollywood are male. We are compelled to consume the male gaze, whether we like it or not, and it often fails to fully incorporate other sexualities and identities. Non-male characters are used to reinforce a mediocre plot in the name of male power.

An interesting comparison is Margo Robbie’s transformation as Harley Quinn and the subtle changes in costume design when Cathy Yan took over the franchise. Over the course of several films, Harley Quinn evolved from creating the fantasy of a mentally unstable, infantilized villain in extremely short shorts to a character leaving an abusive relationship, finding sisterhood, and saving a woman in distress.

SECOND TOPIC: A24 and the modern horror in film

A24, the American independent entertainment company founded in 2012, has played a groundbreaking role in modern horror films. Known for distributing and sometimes producing influential TV shows and movies like Lady Bird, Moonlight, and Everything Everywhere All At Once, A24 has left a significant mark in the horror genre. Films like Hereditary, Midsommar, and Beau Is Afraid by Ari Aster showcase the company’s pioneering work in modern horror.

In modern horror, the genre serves as a platform to convey important messages and provoke thoughtful reflection. A24’s horror films, including The Witch, The Lighthouse, It Comes at Night, X, and Pearl, go beyond conventional scares. They combine supernatural elements with twisted horror narratives, exploring themes like blind faith, cults, and societal obsessions.

A notable aspect of A24’s horror films is the fusion of supernatural elements with the characters‘ emotional depth. For example, Midsommar and Hereditary delve into human beliefs and cults, intertwining the supernatural with the characters‘ experiences. The protagonists may seem morally ambiguous, yet their struggles are relatable, connecting with audiences on a deeper level.

The effectiveness of these characters lies in the actors‘ ability to visually portray emotions such as grief, trauma, loss, and rejection. By depicting these emotions, A24’s horror films bring the genre to the forefront, creating movies that use human emotions to evoke fear in the audience. This approach has elevated A24 to the forefront of modern horror, prompting viewers to engage with the genre in a more profound and emotionally resonant way.

THIRD TOPIC: The 4th wall in film

The imaginary boundary between the events of a film or theater stage and the audience is known as the „Fourth Wall.“ When actors break this boundary, it’s referred to as breaking the Fourth Wall. In instances where plays, TV shows, and films break the fourth wall, they acknowledge the audience’s existence and directly address it. This action blurs the fictional world with the literal reality of the medium: a group of actors performing in front of a live audience or a camera. Actors can step out of their imaginary reality and address the audience watching them, breaking the fourth wall. While most films and TV shows never break the fourth wall, when the imaginary barrier falls, and a character speaks to the real audience, the filmmaker typically has a specific purpose in mind.

To provide a commentary on the scene, actors may turn towards the camera to comment on events in the story. As this direct address often appears absurd, this technique is prevalent in comedy. Breaking the fourth wall pulls the audience out of a fictional world and may clash with the seriousness of most dramas, thrillers, and action films.

Another way to break the fourth wall is by having a character speak an internal monologue, offering insight into their inner thoughts. While this can break the audience’s suspension of disbelief, narrative films seldom attempt this. However, in documentary films, documentary subjects—or even the filmmakers themselves—can address the camera and speak for themselves.

Some directors, inspired by Bertolt Brecht, aim to highlight the artificiality of the film itself. Actors breaking the fourth wall can acknowledge that they are part of a fiction, drawing attention to the symbiotic relationship between the actor and the audience and effectively engaging the audience in the artwork.

Bibliography

First Topic:

Second Topic:

Third Topic: