Pros and Cons with YouTube Piano Tutorials

In my last blog post, I mentioned some disadvantages with digital educational platforms. I stated that I find it hard to believe that an online music platform could displace the feeling of escape one gets from analog sheet music. For that reason, I will use this blog post to summarize pros and cons with one of the most popular educational music platforms: YouTube piano tutorials. I am basing the reflections on findings from recent research. Why are they so immensely popular? What can we learn? 

PROS

Ease of use and accessibility

In comparison to traditional music education, YouTube tutorials are free and easy to access. Everyone with a mobile device and internet can find tutorials and choose between an endless selection of videos. Sheet music is, on the opposite, often behind paywalls with regulated admission, which makes free YouTube tutorials more appealing. 

Adaptability

The endless selection of YouTube videos also offers tutorials to a wide variety of musical levels. As a beginner, it is significantly easy to find videos suitable to your own skills, also as the competence improves. Because the user can pause the videos as often as they would like, they also get the opportunity to watch the videos in their own pace. This might be less stressful than adapting to the music instructor’s preferred pace, who also evaluate every move of the student thoroughly. 

Inner motivation

To find joy in music, it is crucial to find your own inner motivation. For some people, traditional music educations means being forced to play music pieces chosen by the instructor. When people use music tutorials, it is most likely because they really want to learn to play a specific song. They are not being told what to do or forced to play someone else’s favorite music piece. They make their own choices as a result of inner motivation, which then again makes it easier to improve musical competence. 

Fun and easy to understand

YouTube tutorials instruct both which key to press and when to press it (timing). The user interface is easy to understand, and they do not use any new difficult symbols that could scare beginners. This means that near anyone could learn how to play a song on the piano without any prior competence. To learn sheet music, you need to start slow and often with the easiest children’s songs to get used to the different symbols, which could feel demotivational for some people. The use of colors and effects in YouTube tutorials also makes it look more fun and like a game, which appeals to the brain’s reward system. 

CONS

Lack of social interaction

According to the Grammy-nominated drummer Sammy Miller from my latest blog post, it is advantageous to learn music together with other people. Social interaction and especially cooperation motivates students to achieve musical goals. YouTube tutorials are most often used by individuals alone, which means that the positive effects of co-playing and learning are not being achieved. 

Zero digital escape

Use of traditional music sheets gives the brain a break from screen devices and stimulates the brain in a different way. It is easier to concentrate and escape from the digital everyday life. When using tutorials on YouTube, the valuable time spend in front of the piano could be also disturbed by advertisements and notifications. This distracts the deep focus and possibilities to improve musical skills without getting exhausted too fast. 

Lack of self-esteem and feeling of mastery

In my third blog post, I wrote about the findings of Toril Siksjø’s master thesis at the Norwegian Academy of Music in 2015. The article researched the use of YouTube tutorial videos in musical education. The most interesting results from her article was how the different students evaluated their own musical competence after following YouTube tutorials instead of traditional teaching. It seems like digital music education such as tutorial videos result in a lower self-esteem and feeling of mastery among the students. 

Lower level of theoretical comprehension

As mentioned earlier, YouTube tutorials show the user which key to press and when to press it. But it does not require any understanding of which musical tone the key corresponds to. This means that a user can learn how to play numerous songs, without actually knowing what they are playing. They get used to the placement of keys and typical patterns in different songs, but one could argument that it does not give them the fundamental musical understanding. This means that it does not necessarily get easier to learn a new song after spending hours on the first. The curve of skill development may not be affected by the number of hours spent in front of the piano/screen. 

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

To conclude my findings, digital education in form of YouTube tutorials leads to both good and bad effects for the user. For beginners, it is a good way to learn new songs in a fast and easy way, not requiring a lot of money or prior competence. Because of the visual appealing user interface, it appears fun and motivating. On the other hand, it does not help much with the theoretical musical understanding and competence improvement. It could work great as a quick fix, but in a long-term perspective, music education in an analog format probably works better. 

Can Piano Tutorials Compare to Traditional Music Education?

That is what student, piano and music teacher Toril Siksjø asked herself while writing her master’s thesis at the Norwegian Academy of Music in 2015. The thesis is a comparative study of leaning effects and motivation in internet-based piano instruction for high school students. She researched the differences between piano tutorials and traditional teaching, and how it affected the pupils. The research questions were: 

  • Is there any difference in learning outcomes between students taught in a formal context at school and students acquiring knowledge in an informal context through the internet (tutorials)?
  • How do students experience the different pedagogical approaches in terms of motivation? 

To answer these questions, she concocted research in a music program at a high school, specifically in the subject area of instrument/choir/ensemble. The participants were between the age of 16 and 17, and had a basic knowledge of music in advance. She divided the class in two: Group one received traditional instruction, while group two received instruction exclusively through tutorial videos Siksjø produced herself. The content was the same and the only thing that differentiated the groups was the teaching method. Both groups were tested on their learning skills in the very beginning and at the end of the semester. The participants also had to attend interviews and answer several surveys throughout the semester, asking about their learning motivation and assessment of own skills. 

Screenshot of one of Siksjø’s self-produced YouTube tutorials. In addition to the videos, she also created a private Facebook group where students could ask questions about the content of the videos, post comments, and engage in discussions with her and the other participants throughout the project. 

Results

After the project, one of the pupils from group two stated (p. 82): 

I could take it home, and then I could work on it alone. I could go at my own pace. I found it very enjoyable to be able to rewind because it’s not very fun to ask the teacher many times about what this and that is; instead, I could just rewind and watch it again a few times. 

On the other hand, another pupil said (p. 83): 

The day I went home, I thought I would really excel at this, but then I watched the video, and I have a bit of difficulty keeping up. I will never learn what’s in the video, and then I bring myself down, lose concentration, put it aside, and think, if I relax, I can do it later, but I didn’t. Then, there was very little time left, so I actually postponed it quite a bit.

I general, the motivation in group two was declining throughout the semester. Oppositely, the answers from group one was mainly positive, and most of the pupils were satisfied with their own effort. 

When it comes to the theoretical outcome, there was no big difference between the two groups. On the test, they scored on the approximate same level. However, this was not supported by their own feeling of mastery and self-esteem. The participants on group one rated their own level as significantly higher than group two. Siksjø concludes: 

My conclusion is that students who do not receive feedback on their learning process evaluate themselves lower than those who have traditional instruction, which can affect their self-efficacy in future learning processes.

This is a very interesting finding, that I will take in consideration when further exploring the use of different music teaching methods. 

Reference

Siksjø, T. (2015). ”Kari lærte å spille piano da hun sluttet i kulturskolen” .

Musikkpedagogikk, Norges musikkhøgskole, Oslo, Norway. Retrieved from https://nmh.brage.unit.no/nmh-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2379133/Toril_Siksjø.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y