Pros and Cons with YouTube Piano Tutorials

In my last blog post, I mentioned some disadvantages with digital educational platforms. I stated that I find it hard to believe that an online music platform could displace the feeling of escape one gets from analog sheet music. For that reason, I will use this blog post to summarize pros and cons with one of the most popular educational music platforms: YouTube piano tutorials. I am basing the reflections on findings from recent research. Why are they so immensely popular? What can we learn? 

PROS

Ease of use and accessibility

In comparison to traditional music education, YouTube tutorials are free and easy to access. Everyone with a mobile device and internet can find tutorials and choose between an endless selection of videos. Sheet music is, on the opposite, often behind paywalls with regulated admission, which makes free YouTube tutorials more appealing. 

Adaptability

The endless selection of YouTube videos also offers tutorials to a wide variety of musical levels. As a beginner, it is significantly easy to find videos suitable to your own skills, also as the competence improves. Because the user can pause the videos as often as they would like, they also get the opportunity to watch the videos in their own pace. This might be less stressful than adapting to the music instructor’s preferred pace, who also evaluate every move of the student thoroughly. 

Inner motivation

To find joy in music, it is crucial to find your own inner motivation. For some people, traditional music educations means being forced to play music pieces chosen by the instructor. When people use music tutorials, it is most likely because they really want to learn to play a specific song. They are not being told what to do or forced to play someone else’s favorite music piece. They make their own choices as a result of inner motivation, which then again makes it easier to improve musical competence. 

Fun and easy to understand

YouTube tutorials instruct both which key to press and when to press it (timing). The user interface is easy to understand, and they do not use any new difficult symbols that could scare beginners. This means that near anyone could learn how to play a song on the piano without any prior competence. To learn sheet music, you need to start slow and often with the easiest children’s songs to get used to the different symbols, which could feel demotivational for some people. The use of colors and effects in YouTube tutorials also makes it look more fun and like a game, which appeals to the brain’s reward system. 

CONS

Lack of social interaction

According to the Grammy-nominated drummer Sammy Miller from my latest blog post, it is advantageous to learn music together with other people. Social interaction and especially cooperation motivates students to achieve musical goals. YouTube tutorials are most often used by individuals alone, which means that the positive effects of co-playing and learning are not being achieved. 

Zero digital escape

Use of traditional music sheets gives the brain a break from screen devices and stimulates the brain in a different way. It is easier to concentrate and escape from the digital everyday life. When using tutorials on YouTube, the valuable time spend in front of the piano could be also disturbed by advertisements and notifications. This distracts the deep focus and possibilities to improve musical skills without getting exhausted too fast. 

Lack of self-esteem and feeling of mastery

In my third blog post, I wrote about the findings of Toril Siksjø’s master thesis at the Norwegian Academy of Music in 2015. The article researched the use of YouTube tutorial videos in musical education. The most interesting results from her article was how the different students evaluated their own musical competence after following YouTube tutorials instead of traditional teaching. It seems like digital music education such as tutorial videos result in a lower self-esteem and feeling of mastery among the students. 

Lower level of theoretical comprehension

As mentioned earlier, YouTube tutorials show the user which key to press and when to press it. But it does not require any understanding of which musical tone the key corresponds to. This means that a user can learn how to play numerous songs, without actually knowing what they are playing. They get used to the placement of keys and typical patterns in different songs, but one could argument that it does not give them the fundamental musical understanding. This means that it does not necessarily get easier to learn a new song after spending hours on the first. The curve of skill development may not be affected by the number of hours spent in front of the piano/screen. 

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

To conclude my findings, digital education in form of YouTube tutorials leads to both good and bad effects for the user. For beginners, it is a good way to learn new songs in a fast and easy way, not requiring a lot of money or prior competence. Because of the visual appealing user interface, it appears fun and motivating. On the other hand, it does not help much with the theoretical musical understanding and competence improvement. It could work great as a quick fix, but in a long-term perspective, music education in an analog format probably works better. 

Reflections: Strict Music Teachers and Online Educational Platforms

In this fourth blog post, I will use the opportunity to reflect around my chosen topic and contemplate recent discoveries. I recently came across a student opinion article in The New York Times, and it made me think about the importance of good music education and how to measure it. 

The article is based on a guest essay from Sammy Miller, a Grammy-nominated drummer and founder of a music education company. He states that “We’re Teaching Music to Kids All Wrong”, which results in children losing their excitement and enthusiasm for music. He mentions several different advantages children could get if they stick to music, such as being better in math and physics and getting a higher level of conscientiousness. Nevertheless, lack of interest results in plenty early ended music careers. He is wondering why parents and educators are not better at encouraging children to continue, because they never seem to be expressly thankful to have quit music at an early age. In his guest essay, I want to point out this paragraph: 

In my 15 years as a musical educator, talking to countless teachers, I’ve learned one thing: There is no magical fix. Making music education more successful doesn’t need to involve expensive digital accessories or fancy educational platforms (and I say that as someone who developed an online educational platform). There’s no technological or financial program that will convert children into lifelong music lovers.

Even though he has participated in the development of the online music educational platform Playbook, he states that it would not have the capability to convert children into lifelong music lovers. He continues writing that it is necessary to rethink how we teach music from the ground up, and emphasizes the fact that children should be allowed to play around. According to Miller, we should encourage children to be terribleMany children associate music with a difficult undertaking they cannot hope to master, which in the end leads them to giving up. It should not be like that. They should be thought the usefulness of failure. 

Kanioko

Now back to the student opinion article written by Jeremy Engle. The reason why he writes about Millers guest essay, is because he wants to research out if his statements are based on true stories. He asks students: Do we really need better music education? He wants to find out if students agree with the statement that we are teaching music the wrong way. He lists 6 questions related to the topic, and students 13 and older in the United States and Britain, and 16 and older elsewhere, are invited to comment. 

After reading the comments, I truly understood the frustrations and difficulties children goes through while learning new instruments. The article now has 153 comments and as far as I can see, all the commenters agree with Millers statements. They write about how it is to be forced to learning new instruments, and how challenging it is to face strict, perfectionist music teachers. Many of the students commenting ended up quitting music themselves because of low feeling of mastery, which they subsequently find sad. 

I think the numerous advantages of music may disappear if the performer ceases to find joy in the experience. The children need to find their own motivation, and the job of the teacher is to develop it further. Strict rules and perfectionist goals do not contribute. 

I also want to highlight Millers statement about online educational platforms. Personally, I learned to play the trumpet and piano in a traditional way. Even though it was hard to concentrate at times and I truly relate to some of the students’ comments, I also enjoyed the analog format. Throughout my youth, I used music to escape from everyday life and the digital society in general. After staring into my computer and mobile device for hours, the fifteen minutes I spent in front of the piano was used to completely disconnect from digital platforms. It might be a bias while researching this topic, but I find it hard to believe that a digital educational platform really could displace the feeling of escape from analog sheet music. 

Some valuable thoughts and reflections entered my head after reading this article and the attached comments. I do not know what I will end up doing in this project, but now I know that it is important for me to research the possibility to make something fun and playful, preferably in an analog format. 

Reference

Engle, J. (2023, September 29). Do We Need Better Music Education?. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/29/learning/do-we-need-better-music-education.html