Title: Interactive Design Thinking Portfolio: A Tool for User Experience Designers
Author: Behnaz Norouzi
Publication Year: 2017
Institution: Lappeenranta University of Technology
Study Program: Computer Science (Software Engineering)
When I came across this thesis, I was interested to it because of my own interest in creating a tool for UX designers based on the Double Diamond framework. I’m currently exploring how to develop a tool that can provide designers with structured guidance, while also highlighting the importance of different design steps to stakeholders. Norouzi’s work aligned with these goals, providing a solid foundation to evaluate for inspiration and improvement.
Level of Design
The thesis generally includes clear and functional designs for the different design methods within the design thinking process. The graphics are consistent and illustrate the methods effectively, though they could have been more refined or creatively presented for better visual appeal. The Interactive Design Thinking Portfolio prototype itself (https://d2wlbq.axshare.com/home.html) felt quite basic and could benefit from a more intuitive and visually attractive layout. I think there are better designed UX tools online.
Degree of Innovation
The concept of an integrated tool for UX designers is quite innovative, as far as I know. But to fully evaluate this, I need to dig deeper into research for my own project. I would say that her theoretical foundation is strong, but the prototype’s execution lacked uniqueness – as already said. A more modern, user-friendly interface, or features allowing further interactivity, could enhance its innovative appeal. While the tool idea is solid, the implementation doesn’t yet feel like a groundbreaking resource for UX professionals.
Independence
I would say that a certain level of independence is given by developing and designing this UX tool. The approach and idea shows initiative and dedication. I like it, that her approach shows both literature and personal insights. Although the tool itself was not as polished as it could be the process reflects her ability to research and apply design thinking principles.
Outline and Structure
The structure of the thesis is logical and easy to follow, I would say. It begins with an introduction to design thinking, then covers the design thinking process and a lot of different design thinking methods. And after that she continues with her interactive design thinking portfolio. There is also a nice and understandable overview of the structure of the thesis in the beginning, which also helps a lot to find your way through it. In total it’s maybe a bit too much about each design method, without real and deeper meaning outcome behind it.
Degree of Communication
I would say that the ideas and the design thinking process as well as the methods are communicated well. With clear language and examples. The descriptions of each method are detailed and seem tailored to help designers understand the potential applications.
Scope of the Work
The scope covers a broad array of design thinking methods, which is very nice and ambitious for the master’s thesis. As far as I have seen there are more then 25 methods explained methods within the different design phases. It shows an solid, structured approach for UX designers. On the other hand a maybe narrowed focus on a smaller selection of methods could have allowed deeper exploration and refinement. Nonetheless, the thesis provides a comprehensive toolkit that might be useful for structuring my own ideas on this topic. I have to think about it again, if I really want to cover this full range of methods – or if I maybe want to focus on fewer steps in particular. I am still working on my final topic for my master thesis.
Orthography and Accuracy
The thesis appears well-written. I couldn’t read the whole thesis, so I don’t really know about errors. I would say that technical terms are used appropriately, enhancing the academic credibility of the work. However, some sections could maybe benefit from clearer explanations for non-experts. I also couldn’t find a glossar, but at least a list of abbreviations in the beginning of the thesis.
Literature
The thesis includes an extensive range of literature, spanning both foundational design thinking sources and recent studies. This variety strengthens the theoretical framework and aligns well with the practical objectives.
Conclusion
Overall the thesis offers a valuable reference point for anyone interested in UX design and design thinking tools. The Interactive Design Thinking Portfolio could help UX designers organize and prioritize design stages – if it was made a bit better – providing a starting point for my own ideas on creating a Double Diamond based tool. Although improvements could be made in design execution and user interface, as well as in the general theoretical outcome – the concept is innovative, and her structured approach could help me if I stay with my topic
Sources
https://lutpub.lut.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/135197/Master%27s%20Thesis-NorouziBehnaz.pdf
https://d2wlbq.axshare.com/home.html